Pain Medication Agreements – Devil’s in the Details

Prescription Drug Overdose

The Devil’s in the Details

The “Numbered Comments” below correspond to the Numbered Paragraphs of the Sample Compilation Pain Medicine Agreement which is posted below in “bite-sized” chunks for ease of reference.  My Contract Comments are intended strictly to point out to patients who must sign these Agreements that many of the seemingly inconsequential first-appearing Patient Paragraphs contain subtle “physician termination triggers” which can be used by the physician to end the relationship with the patient pursuant to over-broad or completely physician-subjective patient compliance standards.  These Patient Paragraphs which LOOK straight-forward also too often contain subtle but patently unreasonably strict and/or vague terms and conditions with which the patient must comply or be terminated and condemned to eternal Pain Management perdition.

Accordingly, the “devil’s most assuredly in the details” in these Pain Medication Agreements and too often the practical effect is a resulting Agreement which can be terminated by the physician “at will” [i.e., whenever he or she desires to do so].  This resulting potentially unstable Doctor-Patient relationship is contrary to the patient’s understanding that he or she is engaging the Pain Management physician to help improve his or her “quality of life” and entering into a Pain Medication Agreement to simply secure and document the specifics of the Doctor-Patient relationship; which in the medical specialty of Pain Management, are based on mutual candor, communication and trust.  In this regard, patients typically believe this Agreement can only be breached by patients if they violate a material term or condition of the Agreement which is specifically drafted to account for the unusually harsh consequences to the physician of a pernicious patient. Therefore, patients should always read these Pain Medication Agreements carefully to ensure they understand what is expected of them and they should always retain a copy of the signed Agreement as the ultimate accurate reference material regarding the various terms and conditions and other standards with which they must comply or meet.

Public’s Interest in preventing Prescription Painkiller Abuse

In a normal situation where both parties to an agreement have equal bargaining power such that neither has “leverage” over the other, the comments below would be drafted by attorneys and communicated to one another with the intention of modifying the agreement to be objectively fairer and less 1-sided.  But with these Pain Medication Agreements, the public’s interest in preventing well-publicized prescription painkiller overdoses and numerous instances of patients becoming addicted to prescription painkillers has all but negated the patient’s ability to make any significant changes to the Agreement due to the substantial legal and ethical consequences these physicians face when the narcotic drugs they prescribe to chronic pain patients are used incorrectly or illegally by untruthful, irresponsible, disrespectful, devious or criminal people posing as legitimate chronic pain patients.

Learning Practice policies which are NOT written in the Pain Medication Agreement

Given the practical realities mentioned above, I wouldn’t send these comments below to the Pain Management physician.  Instead, I would think about them and highlight the most important ones and then discuss them with the physician before signing the Agreement so that I could gauge why the physician has these de facto termination clauses hidden in various parts of the Agreement.  More specifically, as a patient, I would want to know, to the extent possible, if the physician has taken advantage of the 1-sided Pain Medication Agreement  to interpret even the slightest suspicion of a patient breach of the Agreement as justification to terminate it, or, if the physician has a more reasonable track record and understands that the structure of this particular Doctor-Patient relationship is unusually very important to both parties and requires ease of communication and mutual trust so the patient can rely upon a secure relationship to improve his or her quality of life knowing the Agreement will only be terminated when it has actually been breached.  There is a nuance to the tone of this discussion but the objective is for patients to learn as much as possible about a Pain Management Practice which is not evident from the Agreement they must sign to be treated there.  These brief discussions also reveal important personality traits about both physicians and patients and it is this type of information patients need in order to determine if the Pain Management Practice is the “right” one for them.

What Can Go Wrong for Patients w/ Pain Medication Agreements

As a Patient Advocate, I have seen too many instances of patients being terminated from Pain Management Practices based on mere suspicion when the physician chose to error on the side of caution instead of simply talking to the patient to learn the truth.  I have also seen too many patients terminated from Pain Management Practices because of petty misunderstandings and personality conflicts with physicians couched as patient breaches of the Agreement, when each of which could have been easily avoided had the Practice’s or physician’s communication policy been more reasonable and the physician more accessible.  In that regard, I think patients should keep these possibilities in their minds and discuss them with prospective Pain Management physicians before signing any Pain Medication Agreement.

Post-Termination Clause to prevent Patient Narcotic Withdrawal

A “concept” which should be discussed between physicians and patients prior to signing the Agreement, and then specifically codified in the Agreement as agreed upon, pertains to the inclusion of a reasonable Post-Termination – Pain Management Prescription Drug Treatment Plan for terminated patients who’ve developed a legitimate, “medical dependence” on prescription narcotics so that shortly after an abrupt termination the patient doesn’t go into “Narcotic Withdrawal.” Such a terminated patient would likely be immediately seeking a new Pain Management doctor but that is difficult to do when the patient is going through the visible signs of Narcotic Withdrawal.  Moreover, a patient abruptly terminated from a Pain Management Practice such that he or she would then experience Narcotic Withdrawal and could be seriously suffering physically, mentally and emotionally seems to be an unreasonable “punishment” for breaching an agreement regarding his or her medical care.  Obviously, there should be criminal, irresponsible and disrespectful patient exceptions to this Post-Termination consideration and I would suggest generally deferring to the physician to suggest what he or she thinks is reasonable.  That said, this is the one provision I would respectfully insist be included in the Agreement because terminations happen and the result can be a terrified patient incapable of helping him or herself.

As I did my research for this Post, I was shocked at how many standard Pain Medication Agreements made no mention of addressing the patient’s legitimate “medical dependence” on prescription narcotics during the 30-60 days immediately following the termination. I reference a 30-60 day time period because I think that is a reasonable estimation of the time it would take such a patient to engage with a new Pain Management physician.  Just like I completely understand the need for these Pain Medication Agreements to comprehensively protect physicians from unscrupulous patients, I think it’s unreasonable for physicians to disregard the serious and seemingly punitive medical repercussions for such a patient medically dependent upon prescription narcotics after an abrupt termination of this Agreement.    

#PainManagement Agreement

Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Pain Medication Agreement

Patient Paragraph Section

Paragraph 1 – This clause is perfectly reasonable. (A “patient tip” is to always be building a “file” of your chronic medical condition to document both your history taking prescription narcotic pain medications and your need for a Pain Management doctor, should that ever be necessary to prove, by getting in the habit after the beginning of each calendar year of asking the pharmacy which fills your narcotic prescriptions to give you a computer print-out of all narcotic drugs dispensed to you during the previous calendar year.)

Paragraph 2 – This clause is questionable. A patient would not want to agree to this, as written, because he or she would want prior written notice that a law enforcement agency is investigating before granting such a broad authorization granting unfettered access to his or her medical records to afford the patient some time to clarify what could be a simple case of mistaken identity or to prove identity theft, each of which could be cleared up within a few days’ of prior reasonable notice of any such investigation. Additionally, possible misuse, sale or diversion of his or her pain medication” is too vague and low of a standard to trigger a law enforcement agency investigation during which the patient should voluntarily waive his or her right to privacy and voluntarily surrender open access to his or her medical records.

Paragraph 3 of Pain Medication Agreement

Paragraph 3 of Pain Medication Agreement

Paragraph 3This clause is possibly worrisome. It is certainly the patient’s responsibility to make sure he or she doesn’t run out of pain medication prior to the next scheduled monthly appointment because if the patient takes the medication as prescribed, there should be enough of it to get the patient to the next scheduled monthly appointment with the doctor. But with some diseases and conditions such as Crohn’s Disease, unexpected severe flare-ups could deplete the patient’s amount of monthly pain medication such that he or she will need more of it during that particular month. But in this Agreement clause, the Pain Management physician is disavowing responsibility for helping the patient in case he or she is in such a difficult and unusual medical situation and that difficult situation requires the physician to help the patient on a weekend or a holiday.  That said, it is certainly a “red flag” if the patient continually exceeds the agreed-upon monthly allotment of pain medication, but provided the patient responsibly communicates to the physician the timely change in the frequency and intensity of pain, isn’t this type of contemplated difficult medical situation why the patient is hiring a Pain Management physician?

Controlled Substance Agreement

Paragraphs 4 thru 7 of Pain Medication Agreement

Paragraph 4 – This clause is possibly worrisome. I reiterate many of the same points I made regarding Paragraph 3 above and apply them here.  The language pertaining to the patient consequences from not keeping an appointment or canceling an appointment without complying with very specific notice provisions is rigid, unnecessarily “absolute” and potentially an Agreement termination trigger for the physician.  For example, it is possible the patient might fall off a ladder and fracture his or her back (as has recently happened to me) and thus be unable to attend his next scheduled monthly appointment, but as proscribed by this language, that patient will be punished by not being given his next month’s medication refill simply for having the bad luck of sustaining disabling injuries from accidentally falling off a ladder and sustaining such serious injuries they prevented him from keeping and attending an appointment. You’d think these “penalties” would be waived if the patient reasonably and timely accounted for such accidents or unexpected intense flare-ups of his disease preventing him from keeping an appointment but there is no such wiggle room in this Agreement.   Additionally, may constitute grounds for immediate termination  …” [emphasis added] is vague and meaningless to the patient as a standard.  It means the Pain Management Practice can do whatever it wants in such a scenario.   The rigidity of this type of language would make me think this Pain Management Practice is not a good fit for me.

Paragraph 5 - The Random Drug Testing clause is perfectly fine. I’d only ask that it be written into the Agreement that the Pain Management Practice pays for the cost of this Random Drug Test since as a patient I have never had to pay for this test.  If it is the Practice’s policy to have patients pay for the Random Drug Test, they should indicate its cost in the Agreement.  The first part of this Paragraph seems wholly inappropriate for this type of Agreement and is completely unacceptable because its language undercuts the mutual trust necessary for a productive and successful relationship between the Pain Management physician and patient. More specifically, when patients see a Pain Management physician, they are entrusting them with the sole reasonable power to help them manage their pain and improve the quality of their lives.  But this language seems to empower the physician to do anything he or she wants and removes any obligation from the physician to help the patient achieve his or her aforementioned objective. To that end, this clause seems to imply a disrespect of patients with chronic pain and complex pain issues.

Paragraph 6 - The absolute nature of this clause is concerning because I have seen other Pain Medication Agreements which essentially say the same thing with the exception that stolen medication would be replaced ONE TIME ONLY and ONLY IF a reasonably satisfactory Police Report was supplied to the Practice in a timely manner. Again, in combination with some of the other “absolute” clauses in this Agreement, this is probably the wrong Pain Management Practice for me.

Paragraph 7This clause is perfectly reasonable. If I lived in a state where medicinal marijuana was legal, I would want to specifically exclude that “drug” in case my doctor and I decided we were going to try it at some point because many Crohn’s Disease patients tell me it helps them with pain.  But, I would never “indulge” without first asking my Pain Management doctor if it was safe given the other drugs I was taking and I received his prior written permission to do so.

Pain Management & Crohn’s Disease

Paragraphs 8 and 9 of Pain Medication Agreement

Paragraph 8 This clause is perfectly reasonable. Same comment as in Paragraph 5 (i.e., I would want language indicating that the Practice pays for the drug test, etc.).  Please notice how the language used in this Paragraph 8 is more respectful of the patient than the wording about the same exact issue in Paragraph 5.  This is because the two (2) clauses are from different Pain Management Practice Agreements.  In that regard, I might infer from repeated instances of such stark differences that the Practice which uses Paragraph 8-like language to communicate the Random Drug Testing seems to be more reasonable and likely more consistently operated on a mutual trust principle.  I would prefer such a Pain Management Practice.

Paragraph 9 - This clause is perfectly reasonable.  I would only ask what type of “Notice” communication this Practice prefers (i.e., fax, email, etc.) because I would want them to get my Notice message and I also would want to use some type of communication medium which can provide me with a Confirmation Notice just to prove I complied with the Agreement. The only other issue I could see with this Paragraph is ensuring the appropriate prescribing of narcotic cough medication is not in violation of this clause.  This is applicable if the patient knows beforehand the specific cough medication his Pulmonologist prescribes a few times a year for a serious lung disease or if the patient gets a severe case of Bronchitis and is prescribed the same type of cough medication. To avoid confusion, I would discuss this with the doctor before signing the Agreement and if I knew which cough medication I was routinely prescribed, I would list it on an Exhibit and have it attached to this Agreement.  Regardless, I still would provide Notice to the doctor under this clause anytime I was prescribed the cough medication.  I just would prefer they are aware of it in case I got so sick that I missed the “next business day” deadline because when my lung problem acts up, I tend to sleep a great deal.

Paragraphs 10 and 11 of Pain Medication Agreement

Paragraphs 10 and 11 of Pain Medication Agreement

Paragraph 10 – The 1st sentence of this clause is perfectly reasonable. The 2nd sentence, however, is very important information for the patient to be aware of but which should have been discussed by the patient and doctor at some point in the initial “non-prescribing” “consultation/mutual evaluation.” In any event, including more “and may be reasons for the doctor to discontinue prescribing to me” language does nothing but add more “grey” area to the physician’s sole discretion to discontinue prescribing a certain pain medication and that would concern me if this type of language were a pattern in the entire Agreement.

Paragraph 11This clause is a good example of the “grey” area I was referring to in Paragraph 10 above because this Paragraph clearly obligates the patient to attend “required follow-up visits with the doctor” but it doesn’t identify the frequency of these “required follow-up visits with the doctor” nor where they will be located, yet, failure to do so results in the discontinuation of this treatment. There is also no mention of an acceptable excuse for not being able to attend nor is there language which explains how the patient is to notify the doctor in case he or she cannot attend these follow-up visits. The 2nd sentence of this Paragraph obligates the patient “to participate in other chronic pain treatment modalities recommended by the doctor” but it does not provide even a clue as to what these other treatment modalities may be. Is this clause requiring the patient to participate in acupuncture, and if so, for how long?  Is this clause requiring the patient to participate in an “ayahuasca” medical trip to the Amazon jungle?  The vagueness of this clause conceivably provides the doctor with additional reasons to terminate this Agreement and since Pain Management is a major life priority for these patients, I think it is disrespectful to make them feel so insecure.  To that end, I would respectfully ask for a reasonable explanation of the issues above and then have them clarified in the Agreement, provided they place no more than a reasonable burden on the patient.

Paragraphs 12 thru 14 of Pain Medication Agreement

Paragraphs 12 thru 14 of Pain Medication Agreement

Paragraph 12 – This clause is inappropriate and unnecessary because by providing the doctor with the sole and subjective power to refer the patient to a drug treatment program merely because the doctor “suspects” the patient is becoming addicted to the prescribed pain medication, the physician has created another termination trigger to utilize if the patient reasonably disagrees and refuses to seek “help” at such a program.   Moreover, the language in this clause obliterates the mutual trust which must exist between a Pain Management physician and a patient for their relationship to be productive and successful.

In more practical terms, if this clause were in an agreement between a client and his or her hairstylist, it would read as follows:

“I understand that there is a small risk that I will be unhappy with my new haircut such that those people close to me will tell me to my face that it sucks. This means that I might become deeply disturbed by the haircut, blame it for getting angry at everything that bothers me in life, or I will be unable to control just how angry I become as a result of this new haircut.  If this occurs, my hairstylist will never cut or style my hair in the same manner and my hairstylist will refer me to a ‘haircut anger management program’ for help with this anger problem.”    

More seriously, based on my experience taking different narcotics for different pain issues at different stages of severity during my 30-year battle with Crohn’s Disease, my Pain Management doctors always listened to me and watched me very closely to determine whether I was ever addicted to a pain medication drug.  In that regard, if my doctor sensed or thought it possible I was using a drug for any reason other than to control my pain or that I couldn’t control my use of the drug, we would discuss any such observations and, if necessary, I was switched to a different drug.  There were never any conclusions verbally made about me or my overall pain management care nor did I ever acknowledge any such addiction.  I simply trusted my doctor and never wanted to become addicted to a particular pain medication so I tried whatever was suggested by my doctor to control my pain.

If I knew my Pain Management doctor was contractually obligated to refer me to a “drug treatment program” based solely on his or her unilateral suspicion of some vague and subjective definition of “addiction,” I would never trust them and therefore would never consider such doctors to help me manage my pain. In this Agreement, it appears from this clause that the doctor will always error on the side of assuming the patient is guilty and thus addicted to a particular drug, and short of some reckless, irresponsible or criminal patient behavior, I would expect more trust from my Pain Management doctor.  Accordingly, I would respectfully confront the doctor who expected me to sign an agreement containing this clause and ask why I should trust him or her when to join their Pain Management Practice I must sign away my right to self-preservation?

Paragraph 13The 1st sentence of this clause is generally reasonable although I would discuss the same concerns set forth above in Paragraph 3 regarding a month or two (2) of pain emergencies or of particularly severe flare-ups during which additional medication might be needed by the patient.  The 2nd sentence is another example of a Pain Management doctor wanting another vague reason to terminate his relationship with a patient.  To that end, what exactly is meant by the phrase, “[a]ny signs of misuse of the medication …”?  What are “signs of misuse”?  Are they objective or subjective “signs”?  Can the patient quickly appeal a decision of “misuse,” especially when it now provides “reason” for the doctor to terminate the Agreement?  Is that appeal process reasonable?

The 2nd sentence should be a very serious concern because people who become lifetime patients with chronic pain typically go through so many difficult emotional experiences, sometimes just to even get the correct diagnosis after YEARS of being mistreated and misdiagnosed, that having to worry about their Pain Management doctor surprising them one day with this clause and terminating their relationship is an added amount of stress which does not belong in this Doctor-Patient relationship.  I would respectfully articulate this to the doctor and ask why it seems he or she needs a “disguised out” in almost every contractual clause of the Agreement and yet the patient cannot hold the doctor accountable to anything in the Agreement?

Paragraph 14Other than the part of this “Catch-All” termination clause which prohibits the patient from obtaining pain medication from anyone else other than this doctor, the rest of the Paragraph seems inappropriate to be included in this type of Agreement because it seems to presume the doctor is using only one (1) pain medication to help the patient and when that stops working or it presents a danger to the patient or “the doctor believes the patient is no longer a good candidate to continue the medication” (???), any member of the doctor’s medical staff can terminate the Agreement.

Call me crazy, but, isn’t it the Pain Management doctor’s JOB to use the right drug OR Treatment Method to treat a patient’s pain? In that regard, isn’t it possible, and likely probable, that the patient’s medical circumstances will change over time such that the doctor will need to try different drugs or techniques such as epidural injections, trigger point injections, acupuncture, etc. to achieve the patient’s consistent primary objective of reasonably managing his or her pain?  Therefore, why is the patient’s apparent evidentiary reasonably non-therapeutic response to a particular pain medication or the doctor’s subjective belief that the patient is no longer a good candidate to continue a certain pain medication grounds for ANYONE on the Practice’s medical staff to terminate this Agreement?  I would never let a Pain Management doctor treat me who asked me to sign a Pain Medication Agreement with this clause in it.  However, I sure would be curious why this clause is in the Agreement.

Physician Cancellation Paragraphs 1 to 5

Physician Cancellation Paragraphs 1 to 5

“My Physician will cancel my contract:” – Section

Paragraph 1 - This clause is perfectly reasonable. 

Paragraph 2 The vague or non-existent medication storage standard makes this clause, at best, worrisome, and at worst, ridiculous. Is this doctor planning a house inspection of the patient’s home to determine how he or she is storing the pain medications? I am joking; no, I am actually mocking the incredibly vague language used in this clause.  But, more seriously, when failure of the patient to comply with this clause grants the physician the power to cancel this Agreement, I fear we are not far away from surprise home inspections of people with chronic pain who take prescription narcotics so they can alleviate their suffering just enough to have some semblance of a quality of life.  In fact, I would even ask the doctor if that is what this clause means.  I would understand if it listed a “consequence” of failing to properly store the medication as the termination trigger.  But, by itself, this clause is another ambiguous and possibly ridiculously intrusive example of Pain Management doctors having no bounds to their feelings of entitlement to protect themselves from chronic pain patients who conceivably could place them at professional risk.

Paragraph 3 This clause is perfectly reasonable BUT without a reasonable and timely  “appeal mechanism” in the Agreement, this could be one person’s word against the patient and then an honest mistake or a person’s bizarre vendetta against the patient could abruptly terminate the Agreement and cause the terminated patient to go into Narcotic Withdrawal.

Paragraph 4 This clause is perfectly reasonable provided the patient is made aware that the drugs he or she obtains from other specialty doctors for pre-existing, provable medical conditions do not have stimulant or anti-anxiety effects. I mention this because many patients with chronic pain have autoimmune diseases and thus they have medical problems which require treatment by doctors in a variety of medical specialties.  To that end, I think it is fair to assume everyone knows what is, and what isn’t, a pain medication, but some drugs prescribed by a patient’s pulmonologist or urologist, for example, might have off-label effects which could be in violation of this clause. Accordingly, I would respectfully discuss this with the doctor and mention every drug typically prescribed to me by these different medical specialists and then codify the doctor’s observations in the Agreement by way of an Exhibit so that I’m not at risk of being terminated by my Pain Management doctor for taking a necessary drug for my lungs which happens to have a stimulant side effect.

Paragraph 5 This clause seems inappropriate for this type of Agreement. Similar to my comments to Paragraph 14 above, I don’t understand why a patient’s significant side effects to a pain medication would cause a physician to terminate this Agreement when there are so many other safe and effective pain medications for the doctor to choose from to treat that particular patient’s pain such that it is merely a question of finding the drug best suited to safely treat or reasonably control a patient’s pain. If a Pain Management physician is unwilling to treat a patient’s chronic pain problem by taking the time to find the appropriate pain medication which works best without significant side effects to that particular patient, I wouldn’t want to be treated by this physician.

#PainManagement Contract clauses

Paragraphs 6 & 7 of Physician Cancellation Section & 3 Post-Cancellation Paragraphs

Paragraph 6 This is too vague of a standard. Sometimes, “life” happens and appointments must be changed or rescheduled. I would certainly understand the implementation of a Cancellation Policy but as written, I have no idea what that means.

Paragraph 7 This Catch-all clause must be deleted because it wreaks of being drafted by a sloppy business attorney who is basically saying, “If I forgot anything, this catch-all clause will cover it.” It won’t.   Clauses like this belong in Asset Sale Agreements and not in agreements which serve as devising the structure of a mutually-trusting Doctor-Patient relationship.

 “Upon Cancellation of my Contract:” – Section

Paragraph 1 This clause is minimally reasonable BUT the phrase “will either stop or taper me off my medication as necessary to avoid withdrawal symptoms” is essentially meaningless because “as necessary” is going to be determined solely by the physician and he or she will likely not be in a benevolent mood in the instance of Cancellation. Instead, I would suggest that the physician make the decision for the question contemplated in this clause only on strict medical grounds depending upon the duration and dose of the cancelled patient’s narcotic pain medication history. If the physician decides a taper schedule is necessary for the patient to avoid withdrawal symptoms, it also should be devised on strict medical grounds depending upon the duration and dose of the cancelled patient’s narcotic pain medication history. Ideally, I would also suggest the taper be for sixty (60) days or two (2) months to afford the patient a reasonable amount of time to engage a new Pain Management Physician.

For these (and other) reasons, it is imperative that Pain Management patients keep accurate records of the duration and dose of all narcotic pain medications they have taken both prior to being treated by this physician and during this Agreement.

Paragraph 2 This clause seems reasonable because it is innocuous in that it is just indicating that a drug-dependence treatment program “may” be recommended. However, such a “recommended” notation may become a permanent part of the patient’s medical records and THAT is problematic because then this clause, as written, implies that the “Cancelled” patient needs drug-dependence counseling or detox when the Agreement, as presently written, could have been terminated or cancelled for reasons that have nothing to do with the patient having an addiction problem.  Therefore, I would respectfully discuss this with the doctor and ask that it be removed or reworded with the above in mind.

Paragraph 3 This clause seems reasonable. This is a difficult Paragraph to codify because it is very kind of the terminating physician to assume a contractual obligation to refer the terminated patient to another Pain Management Practice.  Therefore, I think patients would be better served by suggesting contractual language which establishes a reasonable “Post-Termination Pain Medication Treatment Plan” to avoid going through Narcotic Withdrawal.

The End.  

(In Part 3 of 3, my next – MUCH SHORTER – Blog Post, I will share some Patient Tips, for example, on how to always be prepared to find a new Pain Management Doctor should your Pain Medication Agreement be terminated abruptly, you choose to terminate it, your doctor retires, you relocate to another state or your health insurance changes and you can no longer afford to see your current Pain Management Physician.)

 

A Patient's Perspective on the Contract Clauses in "Pain Medication Agreements"

A Patient’s Perspective on the Contract Clauses in “Pain Medication Agreements”

The Patient’s Perspective re: Pain Medicine Agreements

(This the first of three (3) Posts about being a Patient in the medical specialty of Pain Management.

Post 1 – Educate Patients about the issues involved with selecting the Pain Management physician right for them;

Post 2 – I will provide comments to the clauses contained in the below Sample Compilation Pain Medicine Agreement for the purposes of “educating” patients about the agreements they are signing and how best to ensure their compliance with them.  I encourage patients to discuss the resulting issues with the potential new Pain Management doctor and incorporate his or her answers and explanations into the information they consider in making their selection of the right Pain Management doctor for them.    

Post 3 – I will share some helpful Patient Tips from my extensive experience dealing with Pain Management doctors regarding how to always be prepared to find a new Pain Management doctor should your Pain Medicine Agreement be terminated, you choose to do so, your doctor retires, you relocate to another state or your health insurance changes such that you can no longer afford to be treated by your current Pain Management physician. I will also share some patient tips on how to maintain a credible file about the patient’s need to be treated by a Pain Management physician and the various ways in which to facilitate Pain Management care in a hospital setting after a painful surgery, during a long painful hospitalization or even prior to a surgery which is known to be very painful.)

#PainMedication Agreement for #PainManagement

Extraordinary Pain Management Physicians

Please note that the above “Agreement” (actually Page 1 of same) is a compilation of the different contract clauses of significance to Patients, which I have either seen in the different Pain Medicine Agreements I was asked to sign in order to be treated by a Pain Management physician or from the numerous Pain Medicine Agreements I found during a Google Search in preparation for writing this Blog Post.  Additionally, I feel the need to convey the difficulty I had in writing this Post (which is why it has taken so long to complete) because I am so appreciative of the dedicated, compassionate and professional doctors who practice Pain Management and I do not want to confuse my criticism of Pain Medicine Agreements with the way Pain Management is practiced or by those doctors who practice it.  Finally, due to the passage of even more stringent laws pertaining to the prescribing of narcotic drugs, pristine record-keeping requirements and the specific operation of a Pain Management Practice, it is fair to say these doctors often risk their professional medical licenses to help patients like me, for whom “Pain” is a medical problem separate and apart from any underlying disease or reason which causes it.

The personalized medical treatment required to address, manage and control my pain is extraordinary in this day and age of established healthcare protocols which are followed by too many doctors who simply don’t even listen to patients or won’t let themselves “hear” patient concerns because they are too “programmed” to facilitate the reimbursable “transaction” to get to the next patient. These ordinary doctors are risk-averse due to our litigious society and tend to stick to disease and condition treatment protocols which are widely accepted as “reasonable” medical treatments in the context of medical malpractice lawsuits.  But the Pain Management doctors who’ve treated me are “problem-solvers” and when I come to them with a problem, it then becomes their problem.

More specifically, by listening and hearing my particular pain concerns and trying to devise a pain treatment plan to best combat MY specific problems, these compassionate Pain Management doctors have enabled me to enjoy a decent “quality of life” making memories with the people I care most about despite being deemed systemically disabled from thirty (30) years of Severe Crohn’s Disease which has included twenty five plus (25+) surgeries, two hundred (200) hospitalizations, seemingly never-ending dental work,  unusual complications or side effects from surgeries or medications and grossly disproportionate painful inflammatory reactions to the simplest of maladies.  While my medical history tends to explain my body’s inflammatory reaction, inaction or over-reaction to the aforementioned often painful medical problems, most other doctors nevertheless are skeptical of my pain or they refuse to believe all of these medical realities can happen to one person.  The egocentric nature of most other doctors only reinforces their conclusions and they put me on the “defensive” immediately after they read my medical history, which is extremely detailed to account for such cynicism. But regardless of whatever proof I provide, these other doctors are always unwilling to help ME or to even try and solve MY problem.  This was, and is, not the case with the few extraordinary Pain Management physicians I’ve been fortunate to find.  To that end, I am forever grateful to these consummate professionals.  Thank you Drs. K, H, G and D.

#Pain #Medication Agreement  for #PainManagement

The Purpose of Pain Medication Agreements – in theory

The purpose of a Pain Medication Agreement (a/k/a Medication Use Agreement, Chronic Pain Medicine Agreement, Narcotic/Opioid & Controlled Substance Agreement, Medication Contract, Pain Treatment Agreement and other similar configurations of the same key words/phrases), in theory, is to define the specific structure of the Doctor-Patient relationship when the patent seeks treatment within the medical specialty of Pain Management.  This is necessary because the Practice of Pain Management has a fundamental “loophole” like no other medical specialty; that is, there is no objective Pain Scale to rely upon in assessing the presence, absence or severity of a patient’s pain.  In that regard, on a Pain Scale of 1-10, my “8” and your “8” could represent very different levels of pain severity thus conceivably requiring very different pain medications or at least different doses of the same pain medication. It is therefore difficult for Pain Management doctors to account for patients who “rate” their pain incorrectly or inadequately, purposely or otherwise, or for doctors to weed out patients who lie about their pain to feed an addiction or to serve some other nefarious purpose because the doctor’s ability to gauge the presence, absence or severity of pain is essentially limited to only his or her observational skills of a physical examination and the patient’s word.

The consequences to both doctor and patient of this pain severity determination could not be higher because the treatment for pain usually involves the doctor prescribing potentially addictive and strongly regulated narcotic pain medications. Ergo, the Pain Medicine Agreement is necessary to both protect patients from themselves due to the addictive qualities of the prescribed opioids and to protect Pain Management physicians from jeopardizing their mandatory compliance with the increasing number of comprehensive law enforcement and medical ethics rules and regulations when they unknowingly treat unscrupulous, reckless, criminal, irresponsible or addicted patients.  These laws, rules and regulations mandate the controls for the prescribing and record-keeping of these powerful mind-altering and potentially addictive drugs.

Since the public has a strong interest in preventing the well-publicized and seemingly annual increase in prescription painkiller overdoses and in the prescription drug addiction problems of people of all ages from all walks of life, Pain Medication Agreements are usually drafted without any patient input since it is the physician who would face the legal and ethical consequences of these tragic events or devious people.  But some agreements are so 1-sided and over-populated with ostensibly subjective physician termination triggers, the patient needs to have a better understanding of these types of agreements either before selecting a Pain Management physician or after the agreement is signed so he or she can ensure their ongoing compliance with the Pain Medication Agreement.  I hope to do that with this three (3)-part Pain Management Series of Posts on my Blog.     

#PainMedication Agreement for #PainManagement

Why am I qualified to opine on Pain Medicine Agreements?

As a 30-year Severe Crohn’s Disease patient who has undergone twenty-five plus (25+) surgeries and two hundred plus (200+) hospitalizations related to this gastrointestinal, autoimmune and incurable disease, I’ve had a Pain Management physician for many years once gastroenterologists no longer felt it medically appropriate to address my “pain” and viewed my “pain problem” as a medical issue separate and apart from my Crohn’s Disease which warranted referring me to doctors who specialized in treating Pain.  I have also experienced the unique challenges of changing Pain Management physicians when my health insurance changed and my Pain Management physician was no longer a “member” of the groups of doctors my new health insurance company covered at a reasonable reimbursement rate and I could not afford to pay the large remaining co-payment.  This process of change is much more complicated than changing doctors in any other specialty due to the lack of trust propagated by the loophole caused by the lack of an objective Pain Scale.

I have also had to “start over” as an adult when I relocated from New Jersey to Santa Monica, California and that entailed initiating relationships with a variety of new doctors because my Crohn’s Disease affected several different parts of my body from my eyes to my mouth and from my GI tract all the way to my rectum, and all places and body parts in-between.   Therefore, I was tasked with finding the “right” Pain Management physician “for me” while I was coping with the stress of relocation and beginning a new job. This process is similarly more complicated than it appears, as it is in merely changing Pain Management doctors, and it requires proper planning and at least one (1) “consultation” with the prospective new Pain Management doctor to ensure there is a good fit between the patient and the physician.  I also made a similar change when my Pain Management physician retired.  Additionally, having had surgeries or been hospitalized for lengthy periods of time at several different hospitals for different medical problems related to my Crohn’s Disease, I’ve had to interact with new Pain Management Practices and physicians in each hospital and sometimes post-operative pain treatment plans were designed for me by my Pain Management physician at the time in close consultation with the Pain Management doctors at the hospital.  Each time, however, something substantial went wrong at the hospital and I had to coordinate the management of my pain from my hospital bed. But I learned more from the problems than I did from the “smooth sailing.”

I was also a “transactional” entertainment attorney for approximately twenty (20) years and in that capacity I frequently drafted contracts, analyzed contracts and negotiated contracts until a few years ago when I was deemed “systemically disabled” by virtue of the numerous direct, and indirect, disabling effects of my Severe Crohn’s Disease. (Given my extensive experience in dealing with Pain Management physicians and my significant legal experience evaluating contract clauses of many different kinds, in Part Two (2) of this Series, The Patient’s Perspective re: Pain Medicine Agreements, I will provide comments on the clauses contained in the above Sample Compilation Pain Medicine Agreement for the purposes of “educating” patients about the agreements they are signing in order to get the pain medications they need and how best to ensure compliance with them so as to not jeopardize obtaining their pain medications.  I will suggest more reasonable language for each clause, if necessary, as if I were representing the Patient, but given the already-mentioned strong public interest in the way in which this medical specialty is operated, there should be no expectations my comments of suggested language will be implemented.  Instead, I encourage patients to discuss these issues with the potential new Pain Management doctor and incorporate his or her answers and explanations into the information considered in making the selection of the Pain Management physician who is right for them.)

Doctor – Patient Relationship in Pain Management

A skilled and experienced Pain Management physician employs other reasonably reliable scientific and psychological tests to assess the level of a patient’s pain for the purposes of prescribing the least amount of pain medication required to adequately treat and control the patient’s pain so he or she can safely regain a “quality of life” reasonably commensurate with their lifestyle. A good working relationship or “collaboration” between a patient and a Pain Management physician is one which reasonably takes into account the patient’s individualized need for specific doses of the different pain medications based on his or her medical need and/or provable medical history successfully taking such prescription narcotic drugs (as well as his or her willingness to try reasonable alternative pain-reducing modalities such as acupuncture, epidural injections, etc., when, and if, they are suggested by the physician).  The patient must assume an appropriate sense of responsibility when taking these strongly regulated opioids and he or she must consistently display complete candor with the physician.  As for the physician, he or she must effort to listen (and hear) the patient so he or she can treat the patient in a safe manner which is reasonably consistent with the patient’s medical needs and lifestyle.

Perhaps more than in any other medical specialty, Pain Management is predicated on the unequivocal communication between doctor and patient.  This is why it is imperative for patients to consult with a few different Pain Management doctors before selecting one to make sure his or her reasonable needs will be met at the chosen Pain Management Practice and that the doctor “understands,” or can relate to, the patient’s idea of “quality of life” given his or her medical status and lifestyle.

Codifying the Pain Management Doctor-Patient Relationship

In accordance with the foregoing, the Pain Medicine Agreement must codify the specifics and nuances of the Doctor-Patient relationship while addressing and cementing the “protections” mentioned above regarding the consequences of insincere, devious, criminal or irresponsible patients and also articulating the patient’s objective to better manage his or her pain and improve his or her quality of life.  In that regard, the Pain Medicine Agreement:

  • Ensures complete transparency regarding the dispensing and use of any narcotic prescription drugs so that the patient doesn’t “doctor-shop” and stockpile drugs to sell them or obtain copious amounts of narcotics from different doctors to feed their addiction, thinking no other doctor will realize what’s going on;
  • Ensures the patient obtains all narcotic prescriptions from only one (1) pharmacy which the patient identifies to the physician at the beginning of treatment, thus adding another layer of protection to monitor the dispensing and use of any narcotic prescription drugs;
  • Ensures the patient will not mix alcohol, illegal street drugs or mind-altering drugs with the strong narcotics being prescribed by the physician because mixing these substances could prove lethal to the patient;
  • Helps the physician identify if, and when, the chronic pain patient’s “dependence” on narcotics to control pain doesn’t slip into a dangerous “addiction,” to the point where the patient takes the narcotics for reasons other than to control pain;
  • Helps the physician alter, adjust and seemingly personalize the patient’s pain control medications for maximum effectiveness while also preventing the development of an addiction to these narcotic drugs rather than just a “medical dependence” on them (which is an acceptable but unintended consequence of prescribing opioid painkillers);
  • Assures the physician that the patient is actually taking the prescribed narcotic drugs, in the prescribed amounts, and not unilaterally changing the physician’s carefully designed pain treatment plan for taking these narcotic drugs to most effectively control their pain;  and
  • Protects the compassionate and trusting physician from irresponsible and dishonest patients or prescription drug addicts whose reckless behavior with these highly regulated prescription drugs could subject the physician to serious legal consequences and ethical violations from the various State and Federal law enforcement authorities and Medical Ethics Boards.

 Pain Medicine Agreements – in reality

In practice, however, virtually all of the Pain Medication Agreements which I’ve read contain contractual clauses which are blatantly 1-sided to protect the doctors and minimize their professional risk with respect to prescribing potentially addictive or lucrative painkillers (i.e., on the black market).  These agreements are also devoid of ANY patient considerations or objectives.  They are presented to the patient on a “take it or leave it” basis such that no drugs are prescribed until the Pain Medicine Agreement is signed by the patient.  Since patients suffering from chronic and severe pain can only get the appropriate narcotic pain medications from these Pain Management physicians, these 1-sided “agreements” are really “ultimatums” which the doctors do not even try to disguise as agreements.  These ultimatums serve to only highlight the unequal bargaining position between the parties, i.e., Doctor and Patient.  Moreover, many of these Pain Medicine Agreements contain ostensibly subjective termination provisions which enable the physician to terminate the Pain Medicine Agreement essentially at will and conceivably because of an unfortunate heated-disagreement fueled by a simple personality conflict which could have been avoided if the patient were switched to a different doctor in the Pain Management Practice.  Even worse, an unexpected termination combined with no termination provision establishing an immediate post-termination “pain medication treatment plan” during the 30-60 days following the termination could cause the patient to experience dangerous, extremely uncomfortable and humiliating Narcotic “Withdrawal.”

Abrupt Subjective Termination & Patient’s Narcotic Withdrawal

Narcotic Withdrawal has been described by patients who’ve gone through it as one of the worst ordeals a human can go through.  Typically it is not life-threatening but it is very uncomfortable and the symptoms include: excessive sweating, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, restlessness, insomnia, severe depression, aches and pains, low energy, lethargy, anxiety, panic, chills, irritability, irregular heartbeat and high blood pressure. The acute symptoms can last for up to a week and it could take a few months for the emotional symptoms to dissipate and for the insomnia to return to normal.  But the timing and intensity of the Narcotic Withdrawal largely depends upon how long the patient was taking the opioid and in what dose. The abrupt termination of the Pain Medicine Agreement too often causes Narcotic Withdrawal because many of these agreements contain no provision to protect the patient in such an instance. Hence, it occurs when the patient suddenly stops taking the narcotic instead of gradually weaning off of it in accordance with a taper schedule devised by a Pain Management healthcare professional.

Punitive Effects of Termination & Patient Difficulty finding a New Pain Doctor

Besides having to endure the abrupt termination, the patient’s Narcotic Withdrawal symptoms most likely will affect his or her ability to go to work or to attend to other relatively immediate serious responsibilities. The patient would also have to find another Pain Management Practice to treat or help control his or her pain but that could be very difficult to do while physically and emotionally compromised due to the visible Narcotic Withdrawal symptoms.  Additionally, the patient will likely have to explain to any prospective Pain Management Practice why he or she is changing doctors and that usually entails a follow-up phone call from the potential new doctor to the doctor who terminated the patient and there usually are no contractual guidelines as to what the former doctor can, or cannot, say about the patient and why he or she was terminated.  Assuming the Pain Medicine Agreement contains no patient “termination appeal mechanism” and there is no mention of an immediate post-termination “pain medication treatment plan” so that the patient can find another Pain Management physician while still in perceivable good health, short of an obvious or abhorrent criminal act, is it really necessary to punish and humiliate a patient for breaching a 1-sided Pain Medicine Agreement such that he or she should have to suffer through Narcotic Withdrawal to the point where he or she might lose their job or possibly be admitted to a hospital?     

Are 1-sided Pain Medicine Agreement clauses legally enforceable?

I clearly understand and advocate the need for Pain Medicine Agreements but Pain Medicine Agreements are created WITHOUT ANY INPUT FROM PATIENTS and they are presented to patients to sign on a “take it or leave it” basis.  Usually, such a “take it, or leave it” contract, drafted by the party in control of such egregious unequal bargaining power, is treated by courts as a contract of “adhesion.” Accordingly, the Pain Medicine Agreement is a contract of adhesion because it is presented to the patient on a “take it or leave it” basis, it is drafted by the physician who is unilaterally in control of the agreement’s terms and conditions and the patient has no ability to negotiate because of his or her unequal bargaining position. However, the unfairness typically inherent in an adhesion contract is apparently offset in the case of the Pain Medicine Agreement by the public’s exceedingly strong interest in preventing prescription narcotic painkiller overdoses and the addiction to these prescribed opioids by people of all ages from all walks of life.

In that regard, the courts seem to currently view Pain Medicine Agreements as necessary to serve as guidelines for the structure and operation of a Pain Management Practice because the number of people who die annually from prescription narcotic painkiller overdoses and the number of patients who develop prescription opioid addictions seem to always be increasing yet there are also many patients suffering from chronic pain who have legitimate medical needs for these very effective medications.  That said, the aforementioned newsworthy issues are usually well-publicized and sought out by politicians looking to make a “name” for themselves by proposing new laws to help increasing overdoses and addictions from occurring.

The result is that besides the victims of these awful tragedies and the people who love them, people with chronic pain who need reasonable access to these pain medications are among the losers in this situation because they must often abide by Pain Medicine Agreements which are so 1-sided there is always a possibility they can be terminated by the physician at any time and then the chronic pain patient’s quality of life is destroyed.

 Unfair & Unconscionable Clauses of a Pain Medicine Agreement

To the best of my knowledge, no patient has ever challenged any of the aforementioned blatantly unconscionable clauses of certain Pain Medicine Agreements. But if that happens, and it probably will because politicians appear to be continually “pushing the envelope” in an attempt to make names for themselves by making it harder to get these prescription narcotics but, by doing so, I believe they are coming close to “throwing the baby out with the bathwater,” to the point where the needs of chronic pain patients will approach outweighing the public’s interest in this matter.   After all, most of these chronic pain patients are medically dependent upon these prescription drugs due to chronic, incurable diseases which they had no responsibility in causing.

Therefore, it is conceivable courts or arbitrators will sometime soon view certain Pain Medication Agreement clauses, or the omission of specific clauses in these contracts, such as the establishment of an immediate post-termination “pain medication treatment plan” during the 30-60 days following an abrupt termination, as unfair, and thus unenforceable against the patient, who is the party who had no opportunity to contribute to the language or inclusion of that particular clause in the Pain Medicine Agreement. Courts and arbitrators have a history of carefully reviewing challenged adhesion contracts and they have consistently voided certain clauses or provisions because they could have only resulted from significant differences in the negotiating leverage of the parties such that they are grossly unfair to the party with no or little negotiating leverage relative to the drafter of the adhesion contract.  Courts and arbitrators also strike out adhesion agreement clauses if they are unconscionable. Historically, reasonable, fair and necessary contractual clauses such as the post-termination “pain medication treatment plan” have been implied by courts and arbitrators as included contractual clauses of adhesion contracts for these same reasons.

 Summary

All that said, however, the public, understandably, currently has a very strong interest in this matter and as a result, patients must pay careful attention to the Pain Medication Agreements they sign because it may take a long time for the status quo to change.  I have pointed this out only to educate the patients who regularly or always must rely upon prescription narcotics to manage or control their pain in order to be as productive as possible in society and attain the highest quality of life.  It is just too bad how several tragedies and the acts of several devious criminals posing as patients have made life even more difficult for those people already trying to cope with genetically imposed medical adversity.

 The Patient's Perspective on #PainMedication Agreements

 

Crohn’s Disease – “Even doctors don’t take us seriously”

Mr Ed Jan 1 2015

The “Individualization” of seemingly similar

Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis cases

The statement above was excerpted from a rather lengthy response attributed to a frustrated essentially life-long Crohn’s Disease patient in a recent Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Facebook “Group” when the virtual discussion focused on the tragic death of a young Crohn’s Disease patient soon after her obituary was posted on social media and Crohn’s Disease was listed as the cause of death. While it appears to be scientifically debatable whether the traditional chronic, autoimmune systemic effects of Crohn’s Disease can literally cause death, the writer of this generalized statement took issue with the inaccurate mainstream seemingly “bothersome” portrayal of Crohn’s Disease because “bothersome” does not reflect what is a chronic, incurable, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) which often causes severe, pervasive and disabling physical and emotional manifestations and can have a variety of lifestyle-altering effects due to it being an “Invisible Disease” and it is also a very expensive disease to manage.

While the above generalized statement does not apply to most gastroenterologists who treat Crohn’s and Ulcerative Colitis patients, it does represent an accurate window into the harsh reality faced by many IBD patients because every case seems to be individualized yet, too often, IBD or emergency room doctors fail to distinguish a severe, complex IBD case, which might require immediate medical or surgical intervention, from one that is also severe and complex but nevertheless holds steady at the “status quo.” Moreover, even the most experienced, dedicated and compassionate of healthcare professionals often disagree on the methods they use, and in what order they use them, in treating acute flareups of IBD and/or in managing IBD and/or doing both when the patient is an adult or a child who’s still growing. These “presenting” patient situations, and thus physician decision-making responsibilities, become even more difficult and when the patient has undergone numerous abdominal surgeries, suffers from chronic pain or doesn’t respond favorably to the most effective drug therapies.

UNACCEPTABLE “Homogenized” treatment of different IBD cases

The potentially dangerous homogenized treatment of IBD patients occurs for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is the lack of an agreed upon scientific pathogenesis which explains Crohn’s Disease, Ulcerative Colitis or Indeterminate Colitis [i.e., when symptoms of both Crohn’s and Ulcerative Colitis are present].   There are also disagreements amongst the smartest and most experienced of gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons regarding the manner in which to generally treat these diseases and best utilize the most efficacious drug treatments [i.e., utilizing a “Top-Down” or “Bottom-Up” strategy].   In my humble opinion and based on thirty (30) years of experience with Severe Crohn’s Disease, the foregoing challenges in treating IBD, at least from a patient’s perspective, then become just additional symptoms which must be confronted  like all the other ones.

But it is patently UNACCEPTABLE when physician complacency is to blame for depriving IBD patients of the “personalized” care their unique case of Crohn’s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis requires due to their scientifically proven genetic predisposition for contracting an IBD.  More specifically, there still exists a rather large group of IBD-treating physicians who rely solely upon the current, apparently technologically sound and precise diagnostic tests to the DETRIMENT of the input of living, breathing IBD patients who simply want to help these doctors by contributing HOW THEY FEEL to the accrual of numerous factors which must be considered before an IBD physician devises a diagnosis and then the most efficacious treatment plan.

If a broken-down Car could TALK to the auto mechanic

explaining the symptoms associated with the car not starting,

don’t you think the mechanic would listen? 

Just imagine, for a few seconds, if a car with a perplexing transmission problem could actually SPEAK TO THE AUTO MECHANIC further elaborating on the challenging conditions which prevent the car from starting.  Wouldn’t the auto mechanic welcome such input?  Wouldn’t such input from the car likely provide invaluable information for the auto mechanic such that he or she would have a HUGE advantage over the auto repair shops whose cars were not able to explain their problems?

It is at the intersection of physician complacency and IBD patient crises when not listening to, or trying to appreciate, the pleas of an IBD patient, when catastrophic results are most likely to occur.

The indignities of having to “prove” to a gastroenterologist

in the Emergency Room (ER) of a New Jersey hospital

that I was suffering from EIGHT (8) Intestinal obstructions

Several years ago,  in approximately 1994, this happened to me when my known case of Severe Crohn’s Disease kept causing incredibly painful small bowel obstructions which prompted my parents to bring me to the ER of the nearest New Jersey hospital. Due to having apparently “bothered” the same covering gastroenterologist in that ER three (3) times in one week, with at least two (2) of these instances occurring at inopportune times such as at 4 AM, he had grown weary of my complaints because in his opinion the severity of my pain did not come close to matching the findings of the infallible diagnostic tests on file at the hospital about my case.  His routine physical examination of my abdomen also yielded little scientific evidence for him to take seriously my proclamations of escalating pain and associated pleas for help.  As a result, his increasing annoyance with me provided the fuel he needed to publicly question my integrity and manhood.  Then, in the presence of several kind and compassionate healthcare workers in that ER, each of whom was familiar with me and my Crohn’s case due to my then-frequent appearances in their ER, this heartless doctor accused me of manipulating the vagueness and “incurability” of my Crohn’s Disease to legitimately frequent the ER for the illegitimate purpose of enjoying the attention and the narcotic pain-reducing drugs.

A chronic patient without credibility will never be taken seriously 

Given my noticeable compromised physical and mental states, I was powerless to defend myself from these contemptuous, slanderous remarks made by my own physician.  I felt like a wrongly accused criminal in a John Grisham novel but just like in the movies made of these literary legal thrillers, I knew I had done nothing wrong and somehow would be vindicated in the end.  Without respect for my credibility as a patient with a disease often misunderstood, misdiagnosed or just “missed” by the smartest and most experienced of healthcare professionals, I knew I would never be treated fairly by this doctor despite a well-respected emergency room compromised of a tight group of dedicated, talented and hard-working healthcare professionals, of which my “Gucci”-loafer-wearing doctor was not a member.  [The “Gucci” comment was a running joke in my family at the time once my Mom or Dad had pointed out chronic patients like me helped pay for many of this egomanical doctor’s Gucci loafers.]

A chronic patient should take into consideration

the needs of those who care about him

While heading into New York City on an emergency basis and unexpectedly disrupting the lives of the many people who helped care for me was the exact situation I was trying to avoid when I engaged a highly-recommended New Jersey gastroenterologist whose gastroenterology practice was located close t0 both my New Jersey home and law office, it was obvious to everyone who cared for me, and even to a few of the ER staff members who were kind enough to whisper their moral support into my ear,  I knew I had to continue seeking an answer to my painful intestinal problem before I lost control over my situation and wound up in an operating room in a strange New Jersey or New York hospital. To that end and knowing I would likely suffer another small bowel obstruction shortly after being discharged from the ER, I asked my arrogant Gucci doctor to help me put off the pain for just a few hours so I could travel into New York City and see my regular gastroenterologist, Dr. Mark L. Chapman.

Why I took a “vacation” from mt New York City gastroenterologist?

I had never stopped technically consulting with my NYC gastroenterologist, Dr. Mark L. Chapman, but at the time I was practicing law in New Jersey and it became impracticable for me to see him for routine or even acute Crohn’s Disease matters because the mere travel time involved with going back and forth from New Jersey to NYC would have cut into my billable hours at the law firm.  Dr. Chapman understood my ambition to succeed despite my aggressive form of Severe Crohn’s Disease so he referred me to a local New Jersey gastroenterologist who he had helped train and thus was able to vouch for his capabilities to properly handle my complex case.  My problems was never with that doctor but the inconvenient flare-ups of my disease seemed to always occur when the same condescending Gucci-wearing gastroenterologist was the “covering” doctor on nights, weekends and holidays.

No matter what, ALWAYS be respectful when

addressing a healthcare professional

Probably feeling as if my polite request for pain medication validated his unethical and wholly inappropriate personal swipes at me, my pompous ER gastroenterologist was quick to comply with my respectful request because that meant he could go home sooner.  My parents were active participants in the entire situation but they were unable to remain objective at that relatively early stage of my life with Crohn’s Disease.  They couldn’t tolerate seeing me in such recurring severe pain which had necessitated three (3) trips to the local ER in just that past week and countless ER trips in the weeks and months preceding that week.  But they were beginning to understand my unwavering belief in my body such that they knew “something” had to be terribly wrong for me to be this persistent and almost combative with this New Jersey doctor once it was clear he refused to take me seriously.

LISTENING is still a Doctors’ most effective tool

Within a few hours I had been seen by Dr. Chapman and he listened intently to the medical aspects of my past week and month and then sent me directly for an antiquated, but extremely reliable and somewhat invasive, diagnostic test called an “Enteroclysis.”   The concerned manner in which Dr. Chapman listened to me and then followed-up with probing questions, each with a specific purpose toward determining the most appropriate diagnostic test, was comforting in a way which made me feel like I was exactly where I should be, given my recurring Crohn’s Disease problem. While Dr. Chapman’s office had MY same diagnostic tests and extensive medical history on file as Dr. Gucci in New Jersey, my answers to Dr. Chapman’s questions apparently revealed a significant change in my situation.  I was that talking “car transmission” and Dr. Chapman was an auto mechanic taking advantage of every piece of useful  information I was able to contribute.

What is an “Enteroclysis” test?

At the time, it as my understanding Enteroclysis tests were being supplanted by less “labor-intensive” diagnostic tests because these newer tests were more dependent on technology and they delivered similarly accurate results but in a much more cost-effective fashion.  However, my repeated and distinct complaints of pain in different areas of my small bowel sounded to Dr. Chapman as obstructional pain in different “skip areas” (i.e., segments of diseased small bowel sharply set apart from adjacent segments of normal bowel) of my small bowel thus enhancing the unique value of the Enteroclysis test because it was capable of being precise no matter where in the small bowel “loops” the pain originated or in how many different small bowel loops such precision was required.

This was made possible because the test involved the radiologist infusing drops of radiographic contrast through a thin, clear tube which I had slowly “swallowed” [with the help of minimal intravenous “sedation” because I had to be alert to change positions whenever requested by the radiologist so he or she could advance the tube through all loops of my small bowel] which was then carefully passed through my entire small bowel. Whenever I complained of “blockage-type” pain, the tube “swallowing” part was temporarily stopped so the radiologist could infuse the aforementioned contrast to that exact spot so that it could be “photographed” using fluoroscopy. It was extremely uncomfortable for a few HOURS  but the odd thing about Crohn’s Disease is that you will do that which you never thought you could do just to find answers to the current cause of your pain so that it could be treated and abated or extinguished.

Chronic Patients with incurable diseases like Crohn’s

Disease and Ulcerative Colitis must develop, and work at

establishing, mutually respectful relationships with their doctors

Having known me for several years and successfully guiding me through numerous potential catastrophic hospitalizations and surgeries primarily in New York, but also on business trips or vacations to Alabama, California, Massachusetts, Nevada, etc., Dr. Chapman never doubted me when I complained of such extreme symptoms of my Crohn’s Disease. In fact, Dr. Chapman and his staff had taught me as a young Crohn’s Disease patient to be vigilant in respectfully communicating my symptoms.  But, they also taught me to “choose my battles” because not every pain or symptom associated with Crohn’s Disease is treatable and to harbor such expectations is unrealistic and unhealthy. More importantly, persisting to fight such a battle which could not be won would only negatively affect my credibility with other doctors.  Therefore, I suspected this Enteroclysis test would reveal not so much that I had a gastrointestinal problem which required surgery but that Dr. Chapman was trying to ascertain the urgency of such surgery.  As I would come to learn many years later, trying to understand Dr. Chapman’s anticipatory thought process was like trying to fathom how baseball great Willie Mays would purposely swing and miss at pitches he loved to hit in the early innings of games so that pitchers would confidently throw these same “out” pitches in crucial game situations in the latter innings when Mr. Mays would welcome them and NEVER MISS HITTING THEM for typically game-winning hits.

My New York City gastroenterologist

LISTENED and took me seriously; my

New Jersey “Gucci” gastroenterologist DID NOT

Sure enough, when the radiologist who administered the Enteroclysis test was finished, he politely told me not to go anywhere until after he, and then I, had spoken to Dr. Chapman.  I couldn’t hear their phone conversation but judging by the quiet, confident stride of the radiologist while he shared the test results with Dr. Chapman, I sensed their conversation was revealing and definitely “conclusive.”  I wasn’t sure how to interpret these observations but when the radiologist handed me the phone he looked like an expert car mechanic who had just completed putting together that one car in the shop with the insurmountable mechanical issues which no one in the joint thought could ever be repaired to run as it was designed.  The rest I remember like it happened yesterday.

Dr. Chapman asked me what I was doing over the next few days as if he was planning something and before I could answer he said the following, which I am paraphrasing to the best of my recollection: “Eight (8) Small Bowel Obstructions.  You have 8 of them and they must be fixed immediately.  Cancel all your plans and get your affairs in order so you can be operated on within two (2) days.  I will answer all of your questions when I see you in the hospital but I am very busy with other patients at the moment but suffice to say it, I’m astonished at what you’ve had to put up with during each Emergency Room visit.  Hang in there, my staff will set everything up  and we will get you better.  Okay?”

I was speechless.  Dr. Chapman seemed to be sharing his shock at how my pleas for help were IGNORED while also trying to both act professionally and comfort me.  I trusted him emphatically so there was no need for additional discourse but I so badly wanted to ask him how this New Jersey gastroenterologist had REPEATEDLY missed such an obvious and dangerous diagnosis but I got the feeling there were no acceptable answers and this bothered Dr. Chapman terribly.  I didn’t even have time to be angry at the Gucci gastroenterologist who literally made fun of me for needing to run to the ER for every little pain I experienced. However, I never forgot how his complacency, incompetence and/or indifference caused me and my parents so many sleepless nights worrying about me possibly perforating my bowel and waking up in an operating room, or worse. HE did not take me seriously. Instead, I did exactly what Dr. Chapman told me to do and by the next day or so, I was a patient at Mt. Sinai Hospital in New York City being prepped for major (successful) surgery later that day.

Conclusion 

I can totally relate to the quote above and it’s astonishing to me that Crohn’s Disease & Ulcerative Colitis patients must still worry about the barbaric treatment they may encounter in an emergency room of a hospital during a time of both great technological advancements in healthcare and an appreciation of patients as being one of the most under-utilized resources in healthcare.

The latest and greatest diagnostic tests certainly serve an important purpose in diagnosing and treating Inflammatory Bowel Disease  But there is no substitute for a Crohn’s or Ulcerative Colitis patient who takes the time to clearly and accurately articulate what they are feeling for the benefit of a caring physician who understands that LISTENING is still the benchmark for the best patient care. 

Doctors must take Crohn's Disease & Ulcerative Colitis Patients Seriously

Doctors must take Crohn’s Disease & Ulcerative Colitis Patients Seriously

“Escape The Stall” for good!

WHY THIS IMAGE SHOULD NOT BE USED TO RAISE AWARENESS of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases such as Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

#CCFA #EscapetheStall

 

While I commend efforts to raise awareness of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis, I think by choosing this particular bathroom stall image to reflect these incurable, incredibly challenging and potentially severe, relentlessly painful, pervasive and disabling autoimmune diseases, it defeats any such well-intended purposes b/c all it does is help perpetuate the gross misunderstanding in the global mainstream that Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) such as Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis are merely “bathroom conditions” instead of the life-changing – and sometimes life-threatening – devastating diseases they can become with uncontrollable systemic pervasive physical, psychological, emotional, financial, social, professional and familial effects which cannot be prevented or identified beforehand and are only successfully treated by immunosuppressive and immunomodulator biologic drugs whose side effects are too often so severe that medical researchers cannot work fast enough to discover safer and more efficacious disease-targeted therapies instead of the risky symptom-treating therapies currently available.

Admittedly, these diseases have a “broad-spectrum” of severity and effects such that this bathroom stall image might adequately represent those more fortunate IBD patients who suffer from mild cases of Crohn’s or Colitis.  But, and I believe the following is true for too many Crohn’s & Ulcerative Colitis patients,  THIS visual characterization of IBD in no way, shape or form represents, for example, the Severe Crohn’s Disease I have suffered from for the last 30 years which has resulted in over 200 hospitalizations, 25+ surgeries and side effects from the various aforementioned IBD drugs which have systemically disabled me at the young age of 47 (i.e. as of June, 1, 2010) and left me with a chronic inflammatory lung condition, the pathology of which no doctor in the United States has ever seen before, and which has required 2 vigorous courses of powerful chemotherapy to prevent it from killing me. That said, I am truly one of the LUCKY IBD patients because I know of MANY OTHERS who are much worse off than me.

Accordingly, I just hope this “severe spectrum” of IBD is kept in mind whenever much-needed and well-intended awareness is sought for IBD because few kind, caring and compassionate people are likely to donate their hard-earned money to help find a cure, or safer, more efficacious treatments, for a disease which, as this bathroom stall image could reasonably convey, simply causes more time spent in the bathroom.

A bathroom stall image doesn't persuasively convey the potential seriousness of autoimmune IBDs such as Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis or Indeterminate Colitis.

A bathroom stall image doesn’t persuasively convey the potential seriousness of autoimmune IBDs such as Crohn’s Disease, Ulcerative Colitis or Indeterminate Colitis.


How Anti-TNF Biologic agents treat Crohn’s Disease & Ulcerative Colitis

I recently posted this on Facebook as a “layperson’s” answer to someone with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) who asked if Anti-TNF drugs are basically analogous to chemotherapy and people seemed to respond extremely favorably to it as they indicated it provided them with a better understanding of this common but fairly complex issue.  Therefore, I thought I’d post it on my Blog to document my explanation for anyone in the future who seeks similar information.

While I am your ordinary 30-year Severe Crohn’s Disease patient who has been on all currently available medicinal therapies at one time or another (with the exception of “Entyvio”), I’ve also helped provide the “patient perspective” to various IBD-related scientific endeavors and that has helped me better understand how these biologic agents work to counteract the abnormally overactive immune systems in people with IBD.  I AM NOT A DOCTOR nor do I profess to be well-schooled in the complex biological mechanisms which seem to play a significant role in the development and progression of IBD, but I seem to have a basic and relatively simplistic understanding of this issue so that’s why I am sharing these thoughts.

But 1st – Biologics and IBD Doctors who have NO TREATMENT PLANS

Before sharing the aforementioned explanation, I must share a growing concern I have regarding Biologics which is focused at certain gastroenterologists who have no defined “treatment plan” and instead tell their appropriate IBD patients: “It is time to resort to the Biologics to better manage or control your Crohn’s Disease [or Ulcerative Colitis] to stave off surgery.  Which one do YOU want to go on?” 

In my humble opinion, providing the IBD patient with this “choice” of Biologic seems ludicrous since the main three (3) brand name Biologics, namely, Remicade, Humira and Cimzia, are literally different drugs; Infliximab, Adalimumab and Certolizumab pegol, respectively.  It is true the underlying rationale for the way in which these Biologics treat IBD is the same but they are administered differently, in different dosages and there are medical research studies with conclusions all over the place about whether one should be used before another or whether one is more efficacious in Crohn’s Disease rather than in Ulcerative Colitis or whether one is more effective in treating fistulas or abscesses or even about which one shows greater efficacy in treating IBD which occurs in different parts and levels of the diseased/inflamed gastrointestinal tract.

Biologics seem to affect many IBD patients differently

I know from personal experience how I experienced an anaphylactic reaction to Remicade after a few doses yet I know IBD patients who’ve been on Remicade since approximately 1998 without incident.  I also know I developed severe and disabling irreversible respiratory side effects after graduating to Humira whereas there are many other patients who never experience such symptoms or side effects.  Lastly, some IBD patients can be allergic to one Biologic but not to another one.  All of this information clearly demonstrates the possible different and seemingly “personalized” effects and efficacies of each Biologic on different IBD patients.

Therefore, it seems incumbent upon DOCTORS to make the choice of Biologic in treating severe or progressive IBD cases since it is they who have witnessed how each has worked in different patients and it is they who are privy to the numerous aforementioned studies about the different risks and benefits of each Biologic relative to certain IBD patient histories and/or to their respective known disease etiologies.   In that regard, all I ask is that these gastroenterologists act pursuant to a “Treatment Plan” which THEY devise based on their experience, knowledge of Biologic agents and their understanding of each IBD patient’s disease.  IBD patients who need Biologics to stave off surgery certainly have enough to worry about that they should not be tasked with figuring out which Biologic drug they should be taking for maximum effectiveness in treating their specific case of IBD.

IBD Biologics (immunomodulators) vs. Chemotherapy (or immunosuppressive) drugs

The potential side effects from Biologics can be as serious as those from chemotherapy but the underlying rational of how each treatment works is different. Biologics are referred to as Anti-TNF agents which specifically describes exactly what they do, that is, they slow down a certain protein/enzyme naturally created by the human body (namely, TNF) which is summoned by the body’s intestinal immune system to combat what it perceives to be threatening intestinal bacteria.  But people with IBD have intestinal immune systems which are “over-active” in that when they send TNF proteins to fix the problem and re-balance the bacterial components of the intestine, these TNF proteins either don’t know when to stop “fixing” the problem or they do so in such a way that they cause increased abnormal intestinal inflammation.  The consequences of this increased abnormal intestinal inflammation in people genetically predisposed to IBD can then initiate IBD or make those with IBD even sicker by way of more severe gastrointestinal problems or due to peripheral manifestations of IBD such as sacroiliitis, cataracts, inflammatory respiratory infections, virulent infections, organ failures, etc.

Soon after scientists definitively identified this role of TNFs in IBD, a few biologic drugs were created which effectuate a regulatory impact on these TNFs to prevent them from over-inflaming the intestine, which has scientifically known critical subsequent consequences causing or worsening IBD in patients who are genetically predisposed to it.  A problem with Biologics is that they are predicated on a theory tantamount to using a blowtorch to kill an annoying mosquito resting on a pillow.  More specifically, while these Biologics do exactly what they are supposed to, they are systemically administered and the aforementioned invented drugs which regulate TNF proteins can also evidently have a variety of deleterious effects on different organs and systems within the human body.

Why is there a problem with IBD Biologics?

It seems fundamentally sound to expect tampering with the human body’s chemistry (as in the case of regulating TNFs) to trigger reactive effects in other parts of the body, especially when the “tampering” is done systemically and not in a direct, targeted fashion, but the continued extreme suffering of IBD patients who had exhausted all other treatment options was understandably the priority in the creation of anti-TNF Biologic agents.  But it’s as if these Biologic drugs were created so myopically to influence one of the first major scientific IBD discoveries of practical and therapeutic significance that no one seemed to address the possible or even likely side effects of such potent body chemistry altering medication.  But I assume the FDA approved these Biologic medications because the Biologic drug manufacturers presented a statistically-relevant number of “studies” which convincingly indicated most people do not experience serious side effects from Biologic drugs which work exactly as designed in treating IBD and potentially creating a state of IBD remission.

That said, the side effects of Biologic agents have been known to cause medical problems more painful and debilitating than any IBD flare-up in the patients who are the unlucky ones in whom Biologics are either ineffective or cause dangerous allergic reactions or serious side effects ranging from liver problems to cancer to disabling and even lethal lung infections.

Summary

Accordingly, the possible serious side effects of immunomodulator IBD Biologic drugs occur differently than those resulting from the immunosuppressive side effects of chemotherapy. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there are numerous prestigious and comprehensive IBD research projects currently going on or being undertaken which acknowledge the aforementioned potential pitfalls and potential serious side effects of IBD Biologics and thus are focused on treating other known IBD intestinal triggers but with more targeted and potentially “personalized” drug therapies since no two cases of Crohn’s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis are seemingly alike due to the significant IBD causation role played by the complex interaction of genetics, the body’s immune systems and environmental factors.

Please share your comments regarding your experiences with Biologic Agents in the treatment of Crohn's Disease or Ulcerative Colitis.

Please share your comments regarding your experiences with Biologic Agents in the treatment of Crohn’s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis.

Entire 9/15/2014 Video Interview w/ Dr. Mark L. Chapman re: Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Expert

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Expert

The people responsible for making this project a reality

It has been my pleasure to share the wisdom and experience of this brilliant Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) expert who is one of the few gastroenterologists still practicing who was trained by Dr. Burrill  Bernard Crohn at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City.  The wonderful and encouraging comments I’ve received from diverse Crohn’s Disease, Ulcerative Colitis and Indeterminate Colitis patients from around the world has completely validated all the hard work necessary to bring this ambitious project to viability. Accordingly, accolades are due to Dr. Mark L. Chapman, his staff, Mount Sinai Hospital, the NEW “Susan and Leonard Feinstein Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical Center at Mount Sinai Hospital,” my camera man and technical adviser, Dan Brumer, and my charity, the Crohn’s Disease Warrior Patrol.

The goal of interviewing Dr. Mark L. Chapman from Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City about all things patients need to know about Inflammatory Bowel Disease

My goal was to  take as much out of Dr. Chapman’s brain and get it on camera so that I’d could then edit it into easily consumable online portions of eight (8) short, topic-driven videos to help patients around the world who do not have access to such an knowledgeable, experienced, talented and dedicated physician regarding a disease which has created more questions than answers for the brightest medical and scientific minds spanning several generations and from both every conceivable prestigious academic research institution and practicing Crohn’s Disease, Ulcerative Colitis and Indeterminate Colitis doctors from the best medical facilities in the world.

The current pressing need is for safer, individualized, more targeted, more effective and less expensive IBD treatments or possibly an IBD cure or preventative genetic or biological  interventions

My aspirations with these videos seemed logical and obvious as I am an advocate for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, a 3o-year patient with Severe Crohn’s Disease and the Founder and President of a charity specifically designed to raise global awareness of IBD in the hopes that people around the world will better understand the multifaceted potential severity and pervasive effects of Crohn’s Disease, Ulcerative Colitis and Indeterminate Colitis such that these videos will only add to the current momentum to find safer, individualized, more targeted, more effective and less expensive IBD treatments or possibly an IBD cure or preventative interventions.  The need for such specifically targeted IBD treatments is now imperative because the systemic effects of the most efficacious current IBD treatments such as various immunosuppressive and biological agents are causing patients a significant number of severe side effects such that they are either trading in one disability for another or often opting for new, risky and unproven experimental therapies which are not sufficiently developed potentially causing even more serious problems.  Thankfully, however, Dr. Mark L. Chapman and Mount Sinai Hospital share my concerns and my “time is of the essence” motivation and their respective active participation in this project has been crucial.

Accordingly,  I have embedded the eight (8) videos below in chronological order from 1-8 and I’ve provided a succinct explanation for each so that there exists online a complete set of these videos which you can refer back to at your convenience.  Thank you for watching and sharing your feedback.

Video 1 of 8.  The length of the video is 8 minutes and 55 seconds.  

Video 1 defines the differences between Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

 

 

Video 2 of 8.  The length of the video is 11 minutes and 18 seconds. 

Video 2 defines the differences between Crohn’s Disease, Ulcerative Colitis and Indeterminate Colitis.  

Video 3 of 8.  The length of the video is 10 minutes and 10 seconds. 

Video 3 explains the definition of Diverticulosis and how it differs from Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Dr. Chapman then explains the nuances involved with treating Pediatric Crohn’s Disease & Ulcerative Colitis patients.

 

Video 4 of 8.  The length of the video is 10 minutes and 59 seconds.

Video 4 focuses on the current contrasting and controversial styles of treating Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, i.e., “Top-down” v. “Bottom-up.”  Dr. Chapman also explains how he most effectively interacts with Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis patients when they request certain biologic agents they’ve seen advertised on television. 

Video 5 of 8.  The length of the video is 9 minutes and 31 seconds. 

Video 5 focuses on the too-often long, arduous and stressful “diagnosis journeys” patients must take before they are properly diagnosed and treated for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD)  like Crohn’s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis. Dr. Chapman explains how he combats this decreasing occurrence by taking a compassionate and extensive Patient History, conducting a Physical Exam and carefully combing through all that was done previously in a patient’s case. While technological diagnostic testing for IBD is now state-of-the-art, the most accurate diagnosis still may depend on a simple, but thorough, Patient History. In that regard, Dr. Chapman shares his proven effective techniques for taking Patient Histories.

Video 6 of 8.  The length of the video is 10 minutes and 5 seconds. 

Video 6 focuses on how gastroenterologists diagnose Inflammatory Bowel Diseases such as Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. Dr. Chapman also explains how the simple, seemingly antiquated, “Small Bowel Follow Through” diagnostic test can still be quite effective, and in some cases, even more effective, than the latest technological diagnostic tests such as a Magnetic Resonance Enterography (MRE).

Video 7 of 8.  The length of the video is 11 minutes and 19 seconds. 

Video 7 focuses on a few “Viewer Questions” which seemed to be quite popular topics in various health care social media platforms amongst people discussing Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis beginning with the recent troubling, but still rare occurrence of patients actually dying from Crohn’s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis. Dr. Chapman also explains how an IBD patient should interpret blood tests which are a common occurrence in the lives of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis patients especially given the potential side effects of the immunosuppressive and biologic agents currently given for treatment of IBD.  Dr. Chapman also shares his professional experience and insights with respect to treating IBD patients with the latest IBD drug, “Entyvio” or “Vedolizumab.”

Video 8 of 8.  The length of the video is 10 minutes and 42 seconds.

Video 8 focuses on the mystifying aspects of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) from whether or not Crohn’s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis is hereditary to the most promising IBD treatments currently being researched including stem cell therapy, small bowel transplants, fecal transplantation and personalized T cell immunotherapies.

Please share your comments regarding your experiences with Crohn's Disease or Ulcerative Colitis.

Please share your comments regarding your experiences with Crohn’s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis.

A Pain Management Doctor who should be a Radiologist!!

Recently I took my Mom to see her Pain Management Doctor.  As was the case the last few times she had an ordinary follow-up office visit, he was not there so my Mom was treated by a very thorough and kind Nurse Practitioner.  However, this time something was different about the office visit as it seemed the plan all along for the Nurse Practitioner to treat my Mom.  That probably would have been temporarily okay with my Mom had she been told this when she made the appointment with this doctor, who she is quite fond of.  But if my Mom knew she would only see this doctor during expensive pain-reducing “injection procedures,” she would likely use a different doctor for pain management.

The sneaky substitution of a Nurse Practitioner for my Mom’s Pain Management Doctor  

Having much experience with this medical specialty, I had assumed this doctor was unable to meet with my Mom the past few office visits because an emergency had popped up.  As a chronic patient, I completely understand that needs of other patients might occasionally supersede mine and thus I have great respect for patient emergencies and for the healthcare professionals who attend to them. However, just before we were walked out of the office to make the suggested 3-month follow-up appointment, I respectfully requested that my Mom would like to schedule the follow-up appointment with her DOCTOR. The very kind appointment person told me that was not possible.  I was literally puzzled since it was his compassionate and kind demeanor which attracted my Mom to this particular Pain Management Practice, and no disrespect to the wonderful Nurse Practitioner who had just treated my Mom, I thought it not unreasonable for my Mom to want to meet, and/or speak, with HER DOCTOR – at least every other Office Visit –  if emergencies kept getting in the way.

“We can’t guarantee you will see your Doctor at your next office visit …” [because he is too busy focusing on the more lucrative injection procedures which Medicare reimburses at a significantly higher rate than they do for office visits]

By asking to see her doctor for her next office visit, my Mom and I had stuck a nerve within this Pain Management Practice as apparently this doctor was only available to perform the more lucrative epidural injections and similar complex “injection procedures” and he appeared to only see patients for office visits when his calendar was not booked with these expensive procedures for which I am sure he is paid much more handsomely by Medicare than for the humdrum monthly office visit.  When I respectfully expressed my concern in this regard, the appointment person literally told me she was going to note in my Mom’s 3-month follow-up appointment entry in her computerized calender that my Mom “preferred” to see her doctor.  But then this appointment person politely told us we were not promised or guaranteed this would happen.  My instinctive reaction was something to the effect of, “You must be kidding me?”

[Okay, to the best of my recollection I got angry and while my comment/question was substantially the same, there was a definite “intensity” attached to my statement and my body language was one step short of being enraged by what I perceived to be the greed of this doctor and Pain Management Practice. That said, I did make it CLEAR that my frustrations were not at all targeted at this very polite appointment person and if the doctor were present I would discretely take this matter up with him.   But his availability is sketchy and unpredictable, ergo this Blog Post.] 

A Pain Management Doctor more concerned with Cash-flow than his Patients?

I knew this appointment person was simply following whatever procedure was taught to her but the content of her response triggered red flags within my mind about insensitive doctors who care less about patients than they do about cash-flow.  I further expressed my concerns and the 3 or 4 office staff at the front-end of this medical practice were completely silent, too silent in fact.  That’s when I knew it was reasonable to conclude that this Pain Management Doctor was merely providing his services to the highest reimbursed procedures and not to the neediest patients.  My Mom has had many of these “injection procedures” and this doctor has ALWAYS treated her with great compassion and care but even she realized what was going on at this medical practice.

Is it “Bait and Switch”?  Is it a “Conflict of Interest”? Or is it just plain Greed?

Is it not “bait and switch” to meet with your Pain Management Doctor only to be forever serviced in future routine office visits by either a Nurse Practitioner or a Physician’s Assistant?   Is it not possible that this doctor could be steering his patients to the more lucrative Medicare reimbursed “injection procedures” when merely prescribing simple monthly pain medications would suffice?

Bottom line

When you have office visits scheduled with your Pain Management Doctor but continually see healthcare professionals other than your doctor such as a Nurse Practitioner or a Physician’s Assistant, it is time to find a new Pain Management Practice.

I intend to respectfully confront this doctor during my Mom’s next office visit.  If he AGAIN is not there, I will have my answer.  Then I will share my concerns with him via letter so that he knows why my Mom is leaving his Pain Management Practice.  Moreover, I will suggest to him that he should have become a Radiologist instead of a Pain Management Doctor if he intended to minimize his interaction with live patients.

Comment on a Greedy Pain Management Doctor

Bullying of Crohn’s Disease & Ulcerative Colitis patients

November 6, 2014

While I think health care social media is such a powerful, resourceful and life-changing patient medium, I can’t help but get depressed each time I check in at Facebook and review the desperate but VERY REAL posts from brave members of the various Crohn’s/Ulcerative Colitis “Groups” to which I subscribe and read about patient after patient who must “fight” simply to be treated with dignity by their own physician.  This “fight” is either an internal one whereby they are forced to stand their ground and trust their bodies despite skepticism and contempt so palpable in the doctor’s office that it becomes the “elephant in the room” or it becomes overt when some doctors challenge their capacity to handle adversity, disappointment or pain.  That said, for the most part, there are now WONDERFULLY gifted, dedicated and compassionate Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) doctors all over the world. But when I read these disciplined, intelligent patient Posts about such personally troubling emotional feelings resulting from seemingly experienced gastroenterologists telling them their TEXTBOOK Crohn’s or Ulcerative Colitis severely painful and/or disabling symptoms are “just in their head” – I want to cry about the barbaric diagnostic and treatment culture which STILL affects patients with Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis.

The responsibility of making IBD Treatment Decisions can emotionally overwhelm IBD patients

I understand the skepticism of patients reading this who have life-threatening diseases facing life or death consequences or those with diseases so rare they aren’t even addressed by pharmaceutical companies because they don’t affect enough people to make such an endeavor profitable but I don’t know of another incurable disease like IBD whose recommended treatments are often prescribed based on the “possibility” of them working AND these same treatment gambles routinely cause medical problems which can dwarf the devastating effects of Crohn’s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis.  There is also something about the incurable “grey area” in which IBD resides that makes some gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons feel entitled to manipulate IBD patients simply because they know more about Crohn’s or Colitis  or because “any” treatment which “may” help is better than the patient’s current reality of hopelessness and despair. Finally, physically and emotionally compromised Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis are too often tasked with being forced to make so many impactful decisions about their care that it can cross the line of them truly making an “informed” decision.  The frequent unpredictable hospitalizations and constant suffering is often too much to bare for the patient.  When these patients must also assume cogent responsibility for making the difficult IBD treatment decisions, that’s when the non-intentional infliction of emotional distress could overwhelm them.  Sometimes it’s just a byproduct of an incurable disease which has no upsides but sometimes it’s caused by arrogant doctors who don’t care about the IBD patient’s emotional well-being.  When you think about healthcare professionals acting like that and you contrast it with the heroic selfless efforts of doctors and nurses who travel to West Africa without hesitation to help contain and eviscerate the Ebola Virus to help people they don’t know, at potentially grave harm to themselves, this is deeply disturbing.

The IBD Doctor “God Complex”

While I have been so lucky to be treated by unbelievably bright, caring and compassionate doctors and nurses in my thirty (30) years as a Severe Crohn’s Disease patient, I’ve also witnessed such galling arrogance in the practice of medicine that Alec Baldwin’s portrayal of a doctor with a “God Complex” in the movie “Malice” seemed more like reality television to me.

In my case it happened when a great surgeon, who had operated on me several times and been paid his fee each and every time, performed a simple surgical follow-up on me in his private office after I was discharged from the hospital for a few  weeks.  There wasn’t much for him to decipher other than whether or not I had developed an obvious infection and since I felt fine, I figured the appointment and exam would be uneventful.  I was wrong.  As he artistically salivated at his creative surgical genius on display in and around my belly-button, he understandably began making sure I had not developed an incisional hernia which had been the case with several prior surgeries.  In furtherance of that specific hernia exam and as he was medically-appropriate in holding one of my testicles in his hand, he looked up at me and said the following: “You know, there is still a $3,450.00 balance due on your account?”

Had that been the guy who fixes my car’s transmission, I would have driven my knee into his face.  But because I knew I might need him at some point in the future due to my extremely complex case of Severe Crohn’s Disease, I diffused the situation by joking about how he can’t be that big of an asshole in light of how much money I’ve paid him over the past few years.  He then loosened his grip on my manhood, confirmed I was doing just fine medically and got behind his throne of a desk to continue his money collection efforts.  Thankfully, I was somewhat of a Crohn’s veteran at that point and I was able to laugh about the despicable manner in which he treated me.  And please understand I never questioned his right to get paid his fee for the extraordinary surgical work he had performed on me.  But there is a time, place and manner in which to pursue collection efforts regarding his surgical fee.  Call me crazy, but, it is not the appropriate person, time, place or manner when your surgeon commences collection discussions of his surgical fee while he conducts an important follow-up exam and has your testicle in his powerful grip.

The necessary “Survival” Mental Mindset of “Doing Time” when hospitalized for Crohn’s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis 

I’ve written a candid and funny book about many of the dignity-deprecating situations Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis patients are placed in during their frequent hospitalizations because when it first happened to me I was shocked at the cruel and inhumane treatment which seemed disproportionately prevalent among those specific conditions.  In retrospect, I think I wrote “Confessions of a Professional Hospital Patient” to save the money I would have had to spend seeing a shrink to decompress from all I had been exposed to. And it worked.  I grew thick skin and no future hospitalization scared me so long as I went into “survival mode” and mentally prepared to “do time” prior to my admission. But years later, I let my guard down at one of the world’s most well-respected medical institutions and internationally recognized brand names for innovative, life-saving, pioneering medical treatments, where I was confident my vulnerabilities as a patient with an incurable disease would be respected and not exploited.  To this day, I am still astonished at the “patient-irrelevant,” doctor-centric, myopic, arrogant and downright cold treatment I received there.  As soon as the staff realized my case was going to skew their post-operative efficiency statistics, I was medically treated like the numerical “outlier” who had altered their promotional efficacy aspirations.  It is also the ONLY hospital or medical facility in my thirty (30) years with Severe Crohn’s Disease which began a colonoscopy on me despite someone forgetting to sedate me and within seconds it felt as if the doctor was trying to drive a Buick into my body through my rectum.  I screamed in pain and that international signal of despair was not recognized by this schmuck so I kicked him in the face.  The colonoscopy was rescheduled.

The IBD Facebook Group Posts from Patients who continue to experience unnecessary emotional stress, humiliation and crude treatment from doctors and in hospitals 

I could go on and on with the nightmarish real life medical scenarios I have endured because of my IBD but I thought patients and doctors have evolved over the past few years such that being hospitalized for IBD is more of a “patient-centric” experience.  Regardless, the advances in diagnostic technology would seem to silence any remaining arrogance but EVERY DAY on Facebook in 2014, I read about MANY IBD patients going through similar humiliating and emotionally devastating experiences and I don’t understand why this continues to happen.  For example:

There’s an IBD doctor refusing to execute the appropriate social security disability paperwork because the patient refuses to try Biologic drugs for reasonable and rationale fear of their potential side effects such that the doctor said something to the effect of: “Well, I can’t help you with your social security disability application since ‘you haven’t tried EVERYTHING.’”

There’s a suburban Inflammatory Bowel Disease doctor with an office sign saying “Advanced Gastroenterology” yet he treats a VERY complicated case of Indeterminate Colitis (i.e., a patient with symptoms and manifestations of BOTH Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis) by simply hospitalizing the patient every few weeks and doing nothing other than prescribing steroids and pain medications hoping the incurable disease will soon “learn it’s lesson” and leave on it’s own stead when he should be referring the patient to a more experienced Inflammatory Bowel Disease practice.

There’s gastroenterologists all over the world who refuse to prescribe narcotic pain medication or refuse to educate the IBD patient about the board-certified medical practice of “Pain Management” when his patient with Crohn’s or Ulcerative Colitis is in such severe pain she feels hopeless with no quality of life and comes to him in tears begging for answers.  Instead, he tells the patient the pain is “not that bad” or that there’s too many downsides to taking opioids for IBD to seek some semblance of a quality of life. [Again, call me crazy, but shouldn’t it be the chronic patient’s right to make an informed decision about managing his or her Pain or determining his or her possible Quality of Life?]

There’s compassionate Crohn’s and Colitis doctors treating patients for years and unfortunately they may have to recommend surgery at some point.  Temporarily, that passes the patient care responsibility to the IBD surgeon. But, I have seen NUMEROUS instances of IBD patients having successful resection surgeries and resuming their lives, thus putting them back under the care of their longtime treating gastroenterologist, yet when they subsequently experience terrifying and painful issues in and around the resection site which could be recurrence of their disease or “mechanical” issues like the development of strictures or adhesions, they call these doctors for an urgent appointment but are told to either go to the emergency room or wait SIX (6) WEEKS for the next appointment.  Waiting WEEKS to be seen by a doctor in such an instance could be life-threatening and the understandable impersonal, “band-aid” and triage nature of emergency room treatment is not appropriate for a patient with complex Crohn’s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis especially when they have already been hospitalized  Fifty (50) times and are also responsible for taking care of their children. [Shouldn’t the treating gastroenterologist try and carve out Fifteen (15) minutes in his schedule to help such a suffering patient and parent? Shouldn’t the potential emotional harm to the chronic IBD patient be factored into such rude  and impersonal decision-making?]

There’s hospitalizations from hell all because of one (1) health-worker who doesn’t understand the “nuances” of IBD such that they actually tell the patient they “look fine” and don’t need to be in the hospital despite the patient being unable to hold down jello after being in the hospital for two (2) weeks on high doses of intravenous potent steroids.  That said, nearly every nurse I have ever encountered has been the key to a successful and stress-free hospitalization but too often this type of IBD patient must figure out the hospital protocol for respectfully removing this healthcare worker from their case because being anxiety-ridden before every nursing shift change is no way to recuperate in a hospital from an intestinal obstruction so intense the patient still can’t digest jello after two (2) weeks of being on high doses of steroids.

There’s ego-maniacal Pain Management doctors who robotically treat different Crohn’s and Ulcerative Colitis patients in the same exact manner so that they are sure to cover their behinds with the DEA while not for a minute listening to the patient’s concerns and trying to utilize their formidable expertise to address that SPECIFIC IBD patient’s INDIVIDUAL problem. These same control freaks also unnecessarily tweak the IBD patient’s medication dosages for no reason other than to validate and feed their narcissistic personality disorders. [It is very difficult to find a compassionate and professional Pain Management doctor given the over-reaching, politically-motivated  laws which make it increasingly difficult for patients with chronic pain to get the medications they need in a responsible manner.  Perhaps, more importantly, this also makes the medical practice of Pain Management VERY DIFFICULT due to the stringent record-keeping requirements and other laws and regulations which add significant financial costs to operating such a medical practice. Because of this, I am SO grateful for the compassionate Pain Management Doctors who nevertheless decide to help people like me and SO MANY OTHERS who live with chronic pain.]    

Finally, there are different versions of the uncaring, “ultimatum IBD doctor” who, without any nuance or respect whatsoever, presents a terrified IBD patient with a “take it or leave it” proposition regarding their IBD treatment and the often physically or emotionally compromised patient must then make the best decision regarding drug or surgical treatment options where the short- or long-term side effects and complications of one option is potentially worse than those from each of the others.  Here’s a slightly edited version of a 2014 Post about this which was only edited to preserve the patient’s confidentiality:

I refused to go on a Biologic drug and my doctor refused to put me back on steroids, which had worked in the past. So my father called the doctor and told him he’s concerned that I’m not doing well and that ‘forcing’ treatment options upon me without educating me about the possible side effects and complications is a bit heavy-handed and intimidating to such a respectful longtime patient who has suffered enough that she doesn’t need emotional pressure from her own doctor.  As result, the doctor’s office called me and wants me to come back in. I don’t even know what to tell him. Is there something in the middle that doesn’t have as many side effects as the Biologic drug or the steroids? There has to be a middle-ground treatment option here. I don’t feel like my disease is bad enough to have to start with the Biologics and then possibly deal with their horrific side effects. I’m so confused and scared at the future of my disease.”  [I think it’s FANTASTIC this patient has such a supportive forum like a Facebook Group to vent like this and to seek information from other patients in similar situations but is it just me who thinks this particular doctor is not doing his job?  Is it just me who thinks this doctor is a bully?]

Sadly, these stories never end.  Often times, I am sought out to speak to some of these patients and it is truly my pleasure to try and help them but I am also disturbed at how they are being treated by their doctors.  If I hadn’t experienced similar despicable treatment by a few doctors first hand during Two-Hundred (200) hospitalizations and Twenty-Five (25) major surgeries for Severe Crohn’s Disease, I’d never believe these Facebook Group Patient Posts.  I imagine this happens with many different diseases which are incurable but the consistency and pervasive presence of these Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis patient Posts on all health care social media platforms is alarming.  I don’t know the answers which will alleviate these horrific IBD patient concerns but I damn sure know it is a MAJOR problem which must be acknowledged and addressed by medical professionals.

Summary

I hope more doctors treating Inflammatory Bowel Diseases are able to “connect” with the hopelessness, vulnerability and depression which every IBD patient experiences at one time or another. But too many doctors still bully Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis patients into making the best choice between bad to worse treatment options while they are either in pain, uncomfortable or emotionally compromised by their predicament.  I guess what I’m saying is the best doctors always try to see things from the patient’s perspective.  THAT is a great model to build upon for the physician and patient collaboration necessary to most effectively treat such a challenging and complex disease.  To that end, actor William Hurt demonstrates this brilliantly in this scene from the 1991 movie, “The Doctor” (pardon the Spanish subtitles):

Leave Comment BUTTON

Discriminatory Hospital Patient Ebola Policies

Ebola Stigma in Hospitals

November 3, 2014, West Orange, New Jersey.   This morning I took my Mom for routine blood work at the substantial outpatient facility of a top local hospital chain.  Coincidentally, she had to undergo some scheduled diagnostic tests which prevented her from eating or drinking for several hours prior to the tests.  Since a prescription for this blood work had been sitting on a “To-Do” pile for a few months and it also required several hours of fasting beforehand, I figured we would try to get everything done this morning at this facility.

“Have you traveled to West Africa or had direct contact with an Ebola patient within the past 6 months?”

The attendants could not have been nicer and everything went smoothly other than having to be there at 7:45 AM.   After the two (2) ultrasounds were completed, we were assisted in getting to the laboratory area where I signed my Mom’s name on the check-in sheet and waited to be called.  Upon hearing my Mom’s name called out by the woman facilitating the insurance registration for the blood work, I walked over in my Mom’s stead since she is significantly visually impaired and was still rather uncomfortable from the aforementioned diagnostic tests. The female registration attendant could not have been more professional or kinder and after I provided my Mom’s insurance information she began asking me a series of questions related to #Ebola.  This very polite attendant asked me if my Mom had traveled to West Africa or had direct contact with an #Ebola patient during the past 6 months?  I thought the question reasonably reflected the current times and also demonstrated the hospital’s conscientious approach to patient and overall medical/facility  safety.

“Have you been HOSPITALIZED at a hospital which treated Ebola patients within the past 6 months?” 

But then she politely asked me if my Mom had been hospitalized at a hospital which had treated #Ebola patients within the past 6 months? Huh? I immediately took issue with this question and respectfully asked the attendant why such information is necessary?  Before she could answer, I added that I suffer from an #autoimmune disease (i.e., Crohn’s Disease) which often requires unpredictable long hospitalizations and I would not in any way hesitate, for example, to be admitted to a wonderful hospital like Emory University Hospital, which has recently successfully treated a few Ebola cases, so why is this New Jersey hospital fueling unnecessary fear in patients by asking such a question? Again, before she could answer, my passion got the best of me and I respectfully told her I found this question discriminatory against people like me who are chronically hospitalized because, other than the fallout from the supreme incompetence demonstrated by the Management Executives responsible for preparing to treat infectious diseases at the Dallas, Texas hospital which unexpectedly received the first Ebola patient, I trust ‪#‎healthcare workers and hospital management staffs to safely isolate the treatment of such patients, and even the associated healthcare workers, if they have direct contact with such infected patients.

In that regard, I trust that the isolation of any such Ebola patient, or a subsequent quarantine of the brave healthcare workers who treated such a patient, will be executed humanely, reasonably and in accordance with scientifically appropriate and current ‪#‎CDC #Ebola Guidelines so that patients admitted to a hospital for typical medical reasons are not treated by the same nurses, doctors and medical technicians until the #CDC Guidelines say it is safe to do so.

Slippery Slope of Stigmatizing Hospital Patient Ebola Policies

I made it clear to this attendant that my discriminatory allegation and passionate frustration were not aimed at her.  They are targeted at the hospital’s policy. She made a facial recognition that she understood and then told me she too has a chronic medical condition which often lands her in the hospital and she completely understands my point of contention with this Ebola hospitalization question.  I then reluctantly answered the question but felt an obligation to share my experience to highlight what I believe is the beginning of stigmatizing hospital patient #Ebola policies.  Having been educated as an attorney, I can’t think of a more “slippery slope” and I pray that hospitals become smarter than that and they contemplate the effects of enacting stigmatizing Ebola policies before implementing what are tantamount to local public health policies.  

Scientifically-sound CDC Ebola Guidelines are necessary to stave off the far worse effects of “Ebola Fear”

Given my abnormally high vulnerability to getting any infection in a hospital due to my ‪#‎autoimmune disease, it is my understanding the #CDC creates such isolating or #quarantine #Ebola guidelines so that any such #Ebola treating hospitals need not temporarily shut down or be ridiculously boycotted or wrongly stigmatized by prospective patients (or even by healthy healthcare workers) who become “scared off” simply from uneducated “Ebola Fear.”  (In the case of Emory University Hospital, these prospective patients should instead feel lucky to be the recipient of medical care from such incredibly dedicated ‪#‎Doctors,‪#‎Nurses and Technicians who might be treating them.)

Hypothetical: After being treated at Emory University Hospital for Crohn’s Disease, will THIS New Jersey Hospital now admit me when my Inflammatory Bowel Disease flares-up?

Let’s say I was recently hospitalized for my ‪#‎Crohns Disease at Emory University Hospital, the largest and most comprehensive health system in the State of Georgia.  I ultimately return to my home in New Jersey but a few weeks later I develop such a serious flare-up from my Inflammatory Bowel Disease that I need to be hospitalized immediately.  These same Ebola-related questions would be asked in the Emergency Room of this New Jersey Hospital prior to my admission.  Would my answer of “Yes” to this alleged discriminatory question compel this local New Jersey hospital not to admit me or to admit me with a stigmatizing “brand” that I was treated in the same VERY LARGE hospital in Georgia which had top-notch #healthcare professionals treating #Ebola patients?

Summary: The Slippery Slope of Hospital Patient Ebola Policies can be so stigmatizing that we could have a public health crisis simply based on “Ebola Fear”  

I don’t see ANY merit to asking this #Ebola question of a patient coincidentally hospitalized at a facility which was also treating an Ebola patient.  Further, it only fuels the public’s unfounded fears about the treatment and contagious nature of #Ebola. More relevant to my medical situation, I find this “hospitalization” question to be egregiously discriminatory to patients who are chronically hospitalized.  Just what was this New Jersey hospital going to do with this information? It is no more relevant than, and in my humble opinion, equally discriminatory as, asking me if I were recently hospitalized with a Gay or Lesbian roommate?  We are sliding down a cultural slippery slope and it must stop before a public health crisis is caused simply by “Ebola Fear.”  

 What do YOU think?

Ebola Virus v. Ebola Fear

Medical importance of taking an extensive “Patient History”

While this video was created from a recent interview with a top gastroenterologist to shed light of the Diagnosing Difficulties involved with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) such as Crohn’s and Ulcerative Colitis, it is directly relevant to the current Ebola Outbreak because it reveals the diagnostic importance of taking a simple, but extensive, “Patient History.”

In a technological time of seemingly pin-point medical diagnostic testing, I found this doctor’s candid revelation and productive “Patient History” technique to be comforting since I will never forget the almost 2-year “diagnosis journey” I embarked on to finally be diagnosed with Crohn’s Disease in 1984 at the age of 21.  Most times during that ordeal I found myself “defending” my seemingly unrelated symptoms to smug, smart doctors who only felt comfortable correctly diagnosing me if my symptoms perfectly aligned with a medical textbook definition of a disease which provided them ample legal “cover.”  Luckily, I met this doctor at the end of that journey but had we encountered each other sooner, his very simple, but smart, “Patient History” approach would have revealed I had a severe case of a very serious autoimmune disease which has ultimately disabled me at the young age of 51.  I only hope new doctors embrace this more humane approach because I fear fancy technological diagnostic tests may not always be the best or most extensive approach – especially when tracing “Contacts” in an Ebola Virus situation.

Leave a Comment

This is Video 5 of 8 from my September 15, 2014 interview w/ Dr. Mark L. Chapman of Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City and focuses on the too-often long, arduous and stressful “diagnosis journeys” patients must take before they are properly diagnosed and treated for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) like Crohn’s or Ulcerative Colitis.  Dr. Chapman explains how he combats this decreasing occurrence by taking a compassionate and extensive Patient History, conducting a Physical Exam and carefully combing through all that was done previously in a patient’s case.  While technological diagnostic testing for IBD is now state-of-the-art, the most accurate diagnosis still may depend on a simple, but thorough, Patient History.  In that regard, Dr. Chapman shares his incredibly effective techniques for taking Patient Histories.  (Prior videos from that Interview, are also on this Professional Patient Perspective Blog.)

 For more Information:

Dr. Mark L. Chapman
Susan and Leonard Feinstein
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical Center
Mt. Sinai Hospital
1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029
(212) 861-2000
 
Michael A. Weiss
Founder, Crohn’s Disease Warrior Patrol
www.TheCDWP.org
@HospitalPatient
@CrohnsIBDPatrol